Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:1 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:3 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:4 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas -Sampling Techniques for Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:2 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas- EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:5 of 5
Commentary
Correction
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series (CMAS), Editorial
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series: Editorial
Cytojournal Quiz Case
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Methodology
Methodology Article
Methodology Articles
Original Article
Pap Smear Collection and Preparation: Key Points
Quiz Case
Research
Research Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
View Point
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
2026
:23;
7
doi:
10.25259/Cytojournal_82_2025

Current situation and future prospect of biobank

Weifang People’s Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China
Department of Basic Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China
Department of Molecular Pathology, Qingdao Central Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Ruizhe Wang and Xiaotong Han contributed equally to this work.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Yunxiang Zhang, Department of Molecular Pathology, Qingdao Central Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China. zhangbing199592@163.com.

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Wang R, Han X, Jin L, Wang Z, Sun H, Zhang Y. Current situation and future prospect of biobank. CytoJournal. 2026;23:7. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_82_2025

Abstract

Biobanks are essential infrastructures dedicated to the systematic collection, processing, storage, and distribution of biological samples and related data, serving as fundamental resources for biomedical research. Their application ranges from clinical research and epidemiological investigations to public health monitoring, facilitating the identification of disease-associated genetic variations and the exploration of gene-environment interactions. Biobanks provide valuable resources for systems biology and interdisciplinary research, significantly broadening the scope and depth of scientific inquiry. This review explores the development history, current landscape, and future prospects of global biobanking initiatives, highlighting notable advancements in technological innovation and methodological practices. It also scrutinizes prevailing challenges and envisions future trajectories for development. In the era of personalized medicine, biobanks are expected to play a more critical role by providing the data and samples needed for the development of individualized therapies. By surmounting existing impediments and fostering international collaboration, biobanks are poised to propel scientific breakthroughs and elevate global healthcare standards. This article aims to comprehensively elucidate the trajectory of biobanking development and its profound influence on biomedical research.

Keywords

Biobank
Biomedical research
Ethical Issues
Management
Standardization

INTRODUCTION

Biobanks are indispensable assets in contemporary medicine and biological investigations.[1] They function as vital repositories for a diverse array of biological specimens, encompassing blood, tissue, DNA, and various bodily fluids.[2] These repositories are equipped with a comprehensive operational framework encompassing sample information gathering, processing, preservation, and storage,[3] as depicted in Figure 1. Far beyond mere storage facilities, biobanks are instrumental in driving forward medical research, refining therapeutic interventions, and bolstering public health endeavors.[4,5] By granting researchers access to a wide-ranging assortment of biological samples coupled with extensive associated data, biobanks facilitate pioneering investigations across various medical fields. For instance, their role in identifying genetic markers linked to specific diseases has been instrumental in the evolution of personalized medicinecal research. Onal collaboration, biobanks are poisedic to create profiles.[6] The adept management and housing of extensive biological repositories by biobanks ensure their sustained prominence in biomedical research, catalyzing innovations that culminate in noteworthy medical advancements and the formulation of precise therapies.[7] As crucial pillars within the scientific community, biobanks enhance our understanding of numerous health conditions, fostering more efficacious interventions and making substantial contributions to global healthcare progress. Their strategic importance is poised to escalate as they continue to bolster intricate research endeavors, laying the groundwork for the future trajectory of medical science and individualized healthcare solutions.[8]

Workflow of biobanks (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).
Figure 1:
Workflow of biobanks (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).

CURRENT STATUS OF BIOBANKS

The development of Biobanks

The evolution of biobanks represents a profound paradigm shift in the infrastructure of medical research, fundamentally reshaping the processes involved in the collection, preservation, and utilization of biological specimens.[9] Transitioning from their rudimentary origins as basic repositories for biological materials, biobanks have metamorphosed into sophisticated, dynamic, and interconnected systems that are now indispensable for the progression of contemporary medicine.[10] This metamorphosis mirrors broader transformations in scientific, technological, and ethical landscapes, as well as the growing demand for large-scale, high-quality biological data to support cutting-edge research. The progression of biobanking practices is delineated in Figure 2.[11] The modern concept of biobanking began to take shape in the latter half of the 20th century, signifying a departure from preceding practices characterized by fragmentation and lack of standardization.[12] Prior to this period, collections of biological specimens were typically limited to individual research projects or specific hospital environments. These initial collections were often modest in size, lacked standardized protocols, and were primarily tailored to meet the immediate requirements of researchers or healthcare professionals.[13] For example, tissue samples might be collected for a specific study on a particular disease, yet there was minimal coordination or standardization to facilitate the potential reuse or dissemination of these samples for broader scientific purposes.[14] One of the earliest and most recognized biobanks was established by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) in 1925, initially concentrating on the curation and conservation of microbiology cultures.[15] The ATCC played a pioneering role in demonstrating the value of organized biological repositories, furnishing researchers with access to standardized microbial strains suitable for scientific research and industrial applications. Despite its constrained scope compared to contemporary comprehensive biobanks, this early model laid the foundation for the biobanking concept.[15] The mid-20th century represented a pivotal juncture when university pathology departments and research institutions began aggregating extensive collections of human tissue samples.[16] These compilations primarily served educational purposes, including instructing medical students on human anatomy and disease pathology, or supporting targeted research endeavors aimed at elucidating specific diseases.[17] Nevertheless, these early initiatives remained largely ad hoc, lacking overarching coordination or standardization across institutions. The absence of uniform protocols for sample acquisition, storage, and data governance curtailed the potential of these repositories to contribute significantly to broader scientific progress.[18] The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a dramatic expansion in the scope and objectives of biobanks, propelled by advancements in molecular biology, genetics, and information technology.[5] During this period, the concept of population-based biobanks emerged, marking a shift from small-scale, disease-specific collections to large-scale repositories designed to support long-term health studies.[19] These population-based biobanks aimed to collect biological samples, such as blood, urine, and tissue, along with comprehensive health and lifestyle information from large cohorts of individuals.[20] Through the amalgamation of epidemiological data with genetic material, biobanks transformed from static repositories of biological specimens into dynamic resources capable of supporting a wide range of research endeavors. This synergistic fusion of data and samples empowered researchers to delve into intricate interactions among genetic, environmental, and lifestyle facets in disease pathogenesis.[21] For example, biobanks began to play a critical role in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), aimed at delineating genetic variants linked to specific diseases or traits. The capacity to correlate genetic information with detailed health records facilitated the discovery of novel insights into the genetic underpinnings of ailments such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders.[22] Moreover, biobanks became essential tools for translational research, bridging the gap between basic science and clinical applications by furnishing researchers with the requisite materials and data to craft novel diagnostics, therapies, and preventive strategies.[23,24] The evolution of biobanks has also been shaped by advancements in technology and infrastructure. The development of high-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing and mass spectrometry, has empowered biobanks to amass extensive volumes of genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. Concurrently, improvements in information technology have facilitated the storage, management, and analysis of these large datasets.[25] Present-day biobanks are outfitted with sophisticated data management frameworks that facilitate secure data storage and dissemination, all while upholding compliance with ethical and legal standards.[26]

Timeline of Biobank Development (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).
Figure 2:
Timeline of Biobank Development (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).

Classification of modern biobanks

Contemporary biobanks are predominantly categorized based on their operational goals and sample types, reflecting the evolving demands of precision medicine and interdisciplinary research.

According to operational goals, they can be divided into the following two categories.

Population biobanks

These biobanks aggregate biospecimens and longitudinal health data from extensive and diverse cohorts to facilitate research into gene-environment-lifestyle interactions. The UK Biobank, housing 500,000 samples interconnected with electronic health records, has been instrumental in groundbreaking GWAS.[27] Such studies have identified genetic risk loci, including apolipoprotein E for Alzheimer’s disease and solute carrier family 39 member 8 for cardiovascular disorders.[28,29] Emerging initiatives like China’s Taizhou Longitudinal Study are integrating multi-omics profiling to chart population-specific disease trajectories, emphasizing their significance in guiding public health policies.[30]

Disease-specific biobanks

Focused on understanding pathological mechanisms and promoting therapeutic discovery, these biobanks curate samples from defined patient cohorts. The Mayo Clinic Renal Cell Carcinoma Biobank serves as a prime illustration of this classification, integrating cryopreserved tumor tissues with epigenomic datasets to unveil therapy-resistant subclones.[31] Similarly, the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative systematically archives cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging data, facilitating the validation of biomarkers for tau-targeted therapies.[32]

According to sample types, they can be classified into the following three categories.

Tissues and organs biobanks

An organizational sample bank is a biological resource bank specifically dedicated to collecting and preserving human or animal organ and tissue samples, including tumors, skin, heart, liver, and kidneys. Its core value lies in maintaining the biological integrity and pathological characteristics of the samples. These banks primarily serve basic medical research, clinical diagnostic, and therapeutic purposes.[33] For instance, human tumor xenograft models can be established using patient tumor tissues to test the sensitivity to chemotherapy and guide the application of clinical chemotherapy drugs.[34]

Cell biobanks

Cellular biobanks are specialized facilities dedicated to the collection, preservation, and management of diverse cell resources, encompassing primary cells, cell lines, and stem cells, with the aim of providing standardized cell materials for scientific research, drug development, and clinical treatment.[35] Their primary goal is to uphold the viability, genetic integrity, and functionality of cells to align with the requirements of regenerative medicine, precision medicine, and basic research. Different cell types have various applications: cryopreserved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy cells can be used in leukemia treatment, mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair research, and embryonic stem cells in developmental mechanism studies.[36-38]

Organoid biobanks

Organoids are three-dimensional cellular structures created by culturing pluripotent or adult stem cells in vitro, effectively replicating the physiological and pathological characteristics of organs in vivo.[39] Compared with traditional two-dimensional cell culture models, organoids have structures and functions that are closer to real organs, making them well-suited for investigating organ growth, development, and pathogenesis. In recent years, organoid research has progressed swiftly, assuming a significant role in biological sample repositories. Their utility spans across regenerative medicine, drug screening, gene editing, and precision medicine, offering extensive potential for further development and application.[40] For example, colorectal cancer organoids harboring antigen-presenting cell/ tumor protein 53 mutations allow for real-time tracking of chemoresistance via live-cell imaging.[41] These organoids offer personalized therapeutic validation clinically, as evidenced by cystic fibrosis organoid arrays that assess the efficacy of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators through electrophysiological chloride flux evaluations, guiding treatment regimens for rare CFTR variants.[42] In drug discovery, high-content screening platforms utilize glioblastoma organoid libraries to identify blood-brain barrier permeability of candidate compounds.[43]

Technological innovations in biobanking

The technological innovation of biobanks has consistently focused on improving sample quality, optimizing data management, enhancing resource utilization efficiency, and expanding interdisciplinary applications. Its developmental trajectory has demonstrated a distinct trend of transitioning from individual technological advancements to the integration of multiple technologies, as well as from localized enhancements to comprehensive intelligent systems.[44]

Traditional storage technology

During its early phases, biobanks primarily utilized refrigeration units and liquid nitrogen tanks for sample preservation, with manual procedures overseeing sample handling. This approach was associated with challenges such as imprecise storage conditions, limited automation, inefficient sample management, and a high susceptibility to human error.[45]

Emerging storage technology

The advent of novel cryoprotective agents, including ice recrystallization inhibitors and nanoparticle-based carriers, has revolutionized biobanking by mitigating ice crystal damage, scavenging oxidative stress, and optimizing cryopreservation media, thereby significantly enhancing sample viability and functionality.[46] These innovations address critical limitations of traditional cryoprotectants, such as cytotoxicity and suboptimal recovery rates. For instance, biomimetic antifreeze molecules, inspired by natural antifreeze proteins, exhibit enhanced ice-inhibition efficacy while ensuring biocompatibility.[47] The multifunctional ice-growth suppression system revolutionizes cryopreservation by enhancing stem cell viability through dual cryoprotective mechanisms, meeting the demands of therapeutic applications at a clinical scale.[48]

Information management technology

Biological sample banks began incorporating information management systems to digitally document and manage data related to sample collection, storage, and utilization. For instance, the software ONCO-i2b2, funded by the Lombardy region and developed by the National Institutes of Health project in the United States, enables the integration and collaborative querying of data from diverse origins. This platform retrieves and consolidates data from biobank management software and the field service management hospital information system. By integrating ontology and open-source software tailored to the relevant problem domain, a natural language processing module is implemented. This module automatically extracts clinical information of tumor patients from unstructured medical records, achieving comprehensive, lifecycle-based, information-centric sample management.[49]

Intelligent and remote monitoring technology

Currently, biobank technological innovation has advanced into the intelligent era, integrating cutting-edge technologies such as 5G-internet of things (5F-IoT) and digital twins. The integration of 5G-IoT enables the interconnectedness of various devices within the biobank, facilitating smooth data exchange. Users can access real-time biological sample storage information through mobile devices and engage in remote monitoring and operational activities. Digital twin technology constructs data-driven models of equipment for simulation and predictive maintenance, ensuring long-term operational stability.[50]

Current status and methodological approaches in biobank management

Contemporary biobanks are shifting from disjointed, institution-specific systems to integrated, data-driven platforms, yet significant challenges persist. Widespread adoption of traditional manual management practices, characterized by paper-based tracking and decentralized storage, remains prevalent in many institutions, leading to risks of sample degradation from repeated freeze-thaw cycles and human errors. For example, early Asia-Pacific Region biobanks often lacked standardized protocols, resulting in “dead libraries” with limited accessibility due to inconsistent metadata and siloed governance.[51] Conversely, automated systems demonstrate marked improvements in efficiency and safety through robotic retrieval and real-time monitoring, although substantial initial costs limit adoption among smaller facilities.

Data integration and collaborative models

The integration of multi-omics data with clinical and environmental metadata is reshaping biobanking. The Estonian Biobank (EstBB), a prominent population-based biobank in Europe, serves as a prime example of how this integration is revolutionizing biobanking and personalized medicine. Established 25 years ago, EstBB encompasses 212,000 participants and harmonizes genomic, metabolomic, proteomic, and microbiome data with extensive health records and lifestyle metadata, creating a robust resource for translational research.[51] Similarly, the UK Biobank showcases the impact of longitudinal data, with its 500,000-participant cohort driving advancements in disease risk prediction.[52] Despite these advances, challenges such as fragmented governance and disputes over intellectual property impede seamless cross-border data sharing.

Sharing and utilization of biobanks

The sharing and utilization of biobanks adhere to meticulous and standardized protocols, typically involving procedures such as sample request and approval, execution of legal agreements, sample dispersal and shipment, as well as post-usage feedback and monitoring. During the process, dynamic management of informed consent should be carried out to ensure data privacy and security, while also addressing the allocation of intellectual property rights and interests. For instance, the Cancer Genome Atlas integrates genomic data from 20,000 tumor samples and offers unrestricted access to researchers globally, fostering advancement in scientific research.[53]

Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks

Ethical implication

Biobanks are predominantly intended for prospective research with evolving aims, rendering the traditional “onetime informed consent” model inadequate to accommodate the dynamic nature of research and the long-term reuse of samples. For example, the Icelandic deCODE biobank has faced significant controversy due to its use of national health data for developing genetic risk prediction models.[54] Although participants provided broad consent, subsequent commercial applications have raised public concerns regarding the “insufficient transparency in secondary data usage.” To address these challenges, contemporary ethical frameworks have introduced a dynamic consent mechanism, allowing participants to continually update their preferences for data usage in real time through digital platforms. Moreover, broad consent has emerged as a specialized form of consent within biobank ethical governance. Within this framework, participants consent to the use of their samples and data in future research endeavors with unspecified purposes upon donating biological specimens, thereby facilitating support for long-term and diverse research requirements.

Legal implication

The legal challenges associated with biobanks primarily stem from data jurisdiction fragmentation. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation categorizes genetic data as “special category data,” mandating additional authorization for cross-border transmission.[55] Similarly, China’s Personal Information Protection Law classifies genetic data as “sensitive personal information,” necessitating distinct individual consent and imposing stringent restrictions on processing purposes and methodologies.[56] In contrast, the United States Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act permits the unrestricted flow of de-identified data. These regulatory discrepancies necessitate complex data safe harbor agreements in multinational research initiatives.[57] Furthermore, there remains a lack of international consensus regarding the ownership of samples and data. The regulatory landscapes of biobanks are summarized in Figure 3.[58-62]

Regulatory Landscape of Biobanks (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).
Figure 3:
Regulatory Landscape of Biobanks (Name: Adobe After Effects; Version: CC 2023; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Origin: United States/Name: Adobe Photoshop; Version: 2023.25; Manufacturer: Adobe Systems; Origin: United States; the URL of the database referenced by all elements: https://smart.servier.com/ and https://scidraw.io/. These platforms provide materials under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits free use with proper attribution).

Social implication

The societal implications of biobanks are multifaceted. These repositories house extensive collections of blood, tissue, DNA, and various biological samples, offering researchers a diverse and comprehensive resource for investigating disease mechanisms and advancing drug development.[58] Within the realm of public health, analyzing stored samples facilitates disease trend monitoring, epidemic source tracing, and the establishment of evidence-based strategies for prevention and control. For instance, examining genetic mutations or protein markers in samples can predict the risk of certain cancers and cardiovascular diseases, facilitating early intervention. Simultaneously, it contributes to the assessment of the effectiveness of public health interventions and the enhancement of overall prevention and control protocols to safeguard public health.[59] Moreover, biobanks stimulate advancements in related industries such as biotechnology and biomedicine, attract capital investment, and generate economic value.

CHALLENGES IN MODERN BIOBANKING

Modern biobanks, critical infrastructures for advancing precision medicine and biomedical research, encounter diverse challenges that are contingent on their operational emphasis and scope. These challenges can be broadly categorized into the following dimensions:

Standardization and quality control

Research-oriented biobanks, such as population-based cohorts, encounter challenges related to the lack of standardized protocols in sample collection, storage protocols, and data annotation. For instance, biobanks lacked unified quality control systems, leading to significant variability in sample quality and interoperability. Clinical biobanks, which integrate patient-derived samples with electronic health records, encounter obstacles in preserving the longitudinal integrity of samples due to diverse clinical protocols and incomplete metadata.[60]

Data sharing and collaborative barriers

Despite the exponential growth of biobank resources, fragmented governance and intellectual property concerns hinder cross-institutional collaboration. In China, biobanks frequently adhere to a “single-player” approach, resisting data-sharing mechanisms due to perceived resource competition and insufficient incentives.[61] European biobanks encounter policy misalignment; for example, Germany’s bioeconomy initiatives suffer from conflicting regulations between EU directives and national strategies, hindering resource mobilization.[62]

Technological integration and digital transformation

Commercial biobanks, such as those adopting artificial intelligence (AI)-driven platforms for livestock asset management, face the challenge of harmonizing technological advancement with cost efficiency. While AI and IoT enable real-time sample tracking, integrating these tools into legacy systems remains challenging, particularly for smaller biobanks with constrained IT resources.[63]

Ethical and regulatory uncertainty

Population biobanks that gather genetic and health information encounter evolving ethical challenges related to obtaining informed consent for future research applications and ensuring data anonymization. Regulatory frameworks frequently lag behind technological progress, leading to uncertainties regarding data ownership and sharing procedures.[64]

Financial sustainability

Numerous biobanks rely on short-term grants, posing challenges to operational sustainability. For example, Germany’s bioeconomy projects highlight the necessity for adaptive funding models combining public investment and private partnerships to mitigate market uncertainties.[65] This model serves to mitigate market risks while aligning research endeavors with clinical requirements. To address ethical concerns, governance frameworks ensure transparency, such as tiered data access and shared IP agreements. Such strategies exemplify Germany’s balanced approach to sustaining biobanks without compromising scientific independence.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND INNOVATIONS

The future trajectory of biobanking is intricately tied to its capacity to address present challenges and leverage cutting-edge technologies for enhanced sample preservation, streamlined data integration, and fortified ethical governance. Blockchain technology holds promise in bolstering sample traceability and integrity, ensuring transparent recording of all accesses and utilization.[66] Amazon Biobank, a community-driven genetic database, utilizes blockchain and peer-to-peer technology for decentralized and transparent data sharing. By embedding self-executing smart contracts directly into the system, it enforces equitable benefit-sharing among all participants, eliminating reliance on centralized intermediaries. For instance, proceeds generated from third-party research access are automatically distributed to data contributors in accordance with predefined protocols. The platform’s open-audit architecture allows any user to independently verify transactional and operational records, minimizing dependence on trusted administrators.[67] Data management within biobanks, a fundamental aspect influenced by the sheer volume and complexity of datasets, is poised for transformation through the deeper integration of big data analytics and machine learning. These technologies have the potential to streamline data processing, unveil insights into intricate genetic patterns, and advance personalized medicine research by enhancing the linkage between phenotypic and genotypic data.[68] Meanwhile, the ethical landscape of biobanking, a perennial subject of rigorous debate and sensitive handling, necessitates progress in consent procedures facilitated through digital platforms offering dynamic and precise consent capabilities. This approach empowers donors, ensures transparency, and aligns with regulatory compliance requirements. Moreover, as biobanks grapple with privacy concerns amidst growing data-sharing needs, the implementation of sophisticated encryption methods and blockchain technology could offer solutions that secure data while supporting global collaboration.[69,70] Ethical considerations would also evolve with enhanced regulatory frameworks that adjust promptly to technological advances, guaranteeing the compliance and ethical integrity of biobanking practices amidst emerging modalities. Through cohesive endeavors in technological integration, ethical governance, and international cooperation, biobanks can effectively address current challenges and substantially advance medical research, ultimately enhancing global health outcomes.[71]

SUMMARY

As a critical foundation supporting modern precision medicine and translational research, the establishment of biobanks is gaining increasing significance. The construction standards of biobanks have gradually shifted from extensive collection to standardized management. The continual emergence of diverse technologies has propelled biobanks towards more standardized and intelligent development, furnishing essential resources for disease mechanism exploration and individualized diagnosis and therapy. Despite the rapid development of biobanks, fundamental challenges persist in areas such as ethical governance, quality assurance, and long-term sustainability. Future progress will necessitate a focus on collaborative innovation in technology, standards, and mechanisms to inject fresh momentum into the enduring development of biobanks. Through the strategic evolution of biobanks into “intelligent research platforms,” they are poised to unleash enhanced scientific research value and clinical transformation potential in the era of precision medicine.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

ABBREVIATIONS

5F-IoT: 5G-internet of things

AI: Artificial intelligence

APC: Antigen-presenting cell

APOE: Apolipoprotein E

ATCC: American Type Culture Collection

CAR-T: Chimeric AntigenReceptor T-Cell Immunotherapy

CFTR: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

EstBB: The Estonian Biobank

GWAS: Genome-wide association studies

SLC39A8: Solute carrier family 39 member 8

TP53: Tumor protein 53

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

RZW and XTH: Wrote the original draft manuscript; LCJ, ZTW and HMS: Contributed to the design of the study; YXZ: Reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and consented to the final version of the manuscript for publication. All authors meet ICMJE authorship requirements.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Not applicable.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Ethical approval and consent to participate is not required as this study does not involve animal or human experiments.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2023MH064); Shandong Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (202302061370); Shandong Province Healthcare and Management Research Center Research Project (SDWJYJ2023LM01014); Weifang Medical and Health Technology Development Plan Project (WFWSJK-2024-004).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

EDITORIAL/PEER REVIEW

To ensure the integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double-blind model (authors are blinded for reviewers and vice versa) through an automatic online system.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions. J Transl Med. 2019;17:172.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Performance in omics analyses of blood samples in long-term storage: Opportunities for the exploitation of existing biobanks in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect. 2013l;121:480-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. GBA/GBN-position on the feedback of incidental findings in biobank-based research: Consensus-based workflow for hospital-based biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1066-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:234-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Aspects of modern biobank activity-comprehensive review. Pathol Oncol Res. 2018;24:771-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . The value of consent for biobanking. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5:1125-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Plasma proteomic associations with genetics and health in the UK Biobank. Nature. 2023;622:329-38.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Biobanking and the further development of precision medicine. Pathologe. 2018;39:308-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Improving academic biobank value and sustainability through an outputs focus. Value Health. 2020;23:1072-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Information management. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1590:29-39.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . The significance of biobanking in the sustainability of biomedical research: A review. Iran Biomed J. 2020;24:206-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Global biobank meta-analysis. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1764.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Biobanking for personalized medicine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;864:55-68.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Living biobank: Standardization of organoid construction and challenges. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024;137:3050-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. The ATCC genome portal: 3,938 authenticated microbial reference genomes. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024;13:e0104523.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Precision medicine: Driving the evolution of biobanking quality. Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;33:102-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. The UK Biobank imaging enhancement of 100,000 participants: Rationale, data collection, management and future directions. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2624.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , . New challenges for biobanks: Accreditation to the new ISO 20387:2018 standard specific for biobanks. Biotech (Basel). 2021;10:13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Population-based biobanking. Genes (Basel). 2024;15:66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Integrating population-based biobanks: Catalyst for advances in precision health. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024;24:690-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. The oncolifes data-biobank for oncology: A comprehensive repository of clinical data, biological samples, and the patient's perspective. J Transl Med. 2019;17:374.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. GWAS of longitudinal trajectories at biobank scale. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109:433-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. UPO Biobank: The challenge of integrating biobanking into the academic environment to support translational research. J Pers Med. 2023;13:911.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . The translational genomics core at partners personalized medicine: Facilitating the transition of research towards personalized medicine. J Pers Med. 2016;6:10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Comprehensive information management system for a medical research cohort biobank based on quality by design. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23:222.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , . Biobanking past, present and future: Responsibilities and benefits. AIDS. 2013;27:303-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Genome-wide association studies for corneal and refractive astigmatism in UK Biobank demonstrate a shared role for myopia susceptibility loci. Hum Genet. 2018;137:881-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. SLC39A8.p.(Ala391Thr) is associated with poorer cognitive ability: A cross-sectional study of schizophrenia and the general UK population. Medrxiv [Preprint] 2024
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Interpretation of risk loci from genome-wide association studies of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:326-35.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3475.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of kidney cancer identifies 63 susceptibility regions. Nat Genet. 2024;56:809-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Tau pathology mediates age effects on medial temporal lobe structure. Neurobiol Aging. 2022;109:135-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S. Results from a national survey. Genome Med. 2013;5:3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Progress in building clinically relevant patient-derived tumor xenograft models for cancer research. Animal Model Exp Med. 2023;6:381-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , . Principles of biobanking and biobanks of central nervous system tumors in world practice. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2022;86:91-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies: Current opportunities and challenges. Front Immunol. 2022;13:927153.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:195.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Inhibition of HDAC activity directly reprograms murine embryonic stem cells to trophoblast stem cells. Dev Cell. 2024;59:2101-117.e2108.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , . Living biobanks of organoids: Valuable resource for translational research. Biopreserv Biobank. 2024;22:543-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , . Tumor organoids: Applications in cancer modeling and potentials in precision medicine. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , , , et al. EGFR controls transcriptional and metabolic rewiring in KRASG12D colorectal cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2025;17:1355-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Intestinal organoids for cystic fibrosis research. J Cyst Fibros. 2020;19(Suppl 1):S60-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Establishment of patient-derived organoid models of lower-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24:612-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , . A survey on the role of artificial intelligence in biobanking studies: A systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:1179.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. Basic principles of biobanking: From biological samples to precision medicine for patients. Virchows Arch. 2021;479:233-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , . Inhibiting ice recrystallization by nanocelluloses. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20:1667-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , . Strong inhibition of ice growth by biomimetic crowding coacervates. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62:e202311047.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , , et al. Multifunctional Photo-and Magnetoresponsive Graphene Oxide-Fe3O4 nanocomposite-alginate hydrogel platform for ice recrystallization inhibition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:12379-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , et al. The ONCO-I2b2 project: Integrating biobank information and clinical data to support translational research in oncology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:887-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , . Biobanks in the era of digital medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103:761-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , . Biobanking in the Asia-Pacific region: The challenges of international biospecimen sharing. Biopreserv Biobank. 2023;21:316-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Prospective study design and data analysis in UK Biobank. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16:eadf4428.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , et al. Building a translational cancer dependency map for the cancer genome atlas. Nat Cancer. 2024;5:1176-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. , . Narrativization of human population genetics: Two cases in Iceland and Russia. Public Underst Sci. 2024;33:370-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , . Open data in the era of the GDPR: Lessons from the human cell atlas. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023;24:369-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , . China's personal information protection law. BMJ. 2022;379:e072619.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. . HIPAA in the era of data sharing. JAMA. 2020;323:476-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , . The health insurance portability and accountability act and the practice of dentistry in the United States: Electronic transactions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003;4:108-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. , , . AI and omics technologies in biobanking: Applications and challenges for public health. Public Health. 2025;243:105726.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , , , et al. Addressing the quality challenge of a human biospecimen biobank through the creation of a quality management system. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0278780.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. , , , , , , et al. Best practices for human biobank ethics review in China. Biopreserv Biobank. 2020;18:274-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , . Evaluating the German Biobank node as coordinating institution of the german biobank alliance: Engaging with stakeholders via survey research. Biopreserv Biobank. 2020;18:64-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , , , et al. Enabling demonstrated consent for biobanking with blockchain and generative AI. Am J Bioeth. 2025;25:96-111.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , , , , et al. Collecting biospecimens and obtaining biobank consent from patients in an Academic health care setting: Practical and ethical considerations. Acad Med. 2022;97:62-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , , , , et al. Position statement from the German biobank alliance on the cooperation between academic biobanks and industry partners. Biopreserv Biobank. 2019;17:372-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. , , , , , . Increasing the security and traceability of biological samples in biobanks by blockchain technology. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023;231:107379.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. , , , , . Amazon biobank: Assessing the implementation of a blockchain-based genomic database. IEEE Access. 2024;12:9632-47.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. , , , . Digital biobanking and big data as a new research tool: A position paper. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:1825.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. . Privacy and security within biobanking: The role of information technology. J Law Med Ethics. 2016;44:156-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. , , , . Ethical issues in bio-sample sharing among the public in Jordan. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06316.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. , , , , . Ethics reporting in biospecimen and genetic research: Current practice and suggestions for changes. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002521.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections