Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:1 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:3 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:4 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas -Sampling Techniques for Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:2 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas- EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:5 of 5
Commentary
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series (CMAS), Editorial
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series: Editorial
Cytojournal Quiz Case
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Methodology
Methodology Article
Methodology Articles
Original Article
Pap Smear Collection and Preparation: Key Points
Quiz Case
Research
Research Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
View Point
View/Download PDF

Prominent emperipolesis in breast lesion: A diagnostic challenge

Department of Pathology, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Surgery, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Brijnandan Gupta, Department of Pathology, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. brij9890470@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sahai R, Singh D, Shrivastava V, Singh M, Gupta B. Prominent emperipolesis in breast lesion: A diagnostic challenge. CytoJournal 2023;20:32.

A middle-aged woman presented with a lump in her left breast for 8 months. She complained of multiple episodes of intense itching in the lesion along with pus discharge in the past 8 months. May-Grunwald-Giemsa and Papanicolaou stained smears are shown in [Figure 1].

(a) Epithelioid cell granuloma with scattered neutrophils (Papanicolaou ×400), (b) Emperipolesis of neutrophils by histiocyte (lower half) and epithelioid cell granuloma (Papanicolaou ×1000), (c) Giant cell, scattered neutrophils, and histiocytes in the background (MGG ×100), (d) Giant cell and histiocytes (MGG ×400).
Figure 1:
(a) Epithelioid cell granuloma with scattered neutrophils (Papanicolaou ×400), (b) Emperipolesis of neutrophils by histiocyte (lower half) and epithelioid cell granuloma (Papanicolaou ×1000), (c) Giant cell, scattered neutrophils, and histiocytes in the background (MGG ×100), (d) Giant cell and histiocytes (MGG ×400).

QUIZ QUESTIONS

Q1. What is the probable diagnosis?

  1. Tuberculosis

  2. Rosai-Dorfman disease

  3. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM)

  4. Sarcoidosis

Answer: C.

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM)

Cytological diagnosis of granulomatous mastitis is challenging. Differential diagnoses include tuberculosis, fungal infections, sarcoidosis, and histiocytic disorders including Rosai-Dorfman disease. Cytological features of granulomatous mastitis include the presence of epithelioid cell granulomas, multinucleated giant cells, histiocytes with phagocytosed neutrophils, and numerous neutrophils.

Q2. Which type of cell is phagocytosed by histiocytes in IGM?

  1. Lymphocytes

  2. Neutrophils

  3. Eosinophils

  4. All of the above

Answer: D. Studies have shown that the presence of neutrophils is an important diagnostic clue in diagnosing granulomatous mastitis, as in the present case, where histocytes showing emperipolesis of neutrophils along with the presence of numerous neutrophils in the background led to the diagnosis in this case. In contrast, Rosai-Dorfman disease shows emperipolesis of lymphocytes. However, in some cases of IGM, lymphocytes and eosinophils have also been seen in the smear or biopsy.

Q3. Based on various studies, which bacteria is associated with IGM?

  1. Corynebacterium

  2. Pseudomonas

  3. Atypical mycobacteria

  4. All of the above

Answer: D. There are many studies which have identified Corynebacterium as the dominant bacteria associated with IGM. But Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Atypical Mycobacteria, and Actinomyces have also been identified. Various other etiology of IGM include autoimmunity and abnormal hormonal levels.

Q4. What is the treatment modality for IGM?

  1. Steroid

  2. Immunosuppressive therapy

  3. Surgical excision

  4. All of the above

Answer: D. Patients of IGM have good prognosis with steroids, antibiotics, and immunosuppressive therapy. In some refractory cases, where medical management failed, surgical excision is offered.

BRIEF REVIEW OF THE TOPIC

Granulomatous mastitis is a rare benign inflammatory entity described by Kessler and Wolloch in 1972.[1] It commonly affects young women of childbearing age usually within a few years of lactation.[2,3] The most common presentation includes a painful nodular lump along with induration and redness.[4] The clinical presentation may mimic malignancy. Cytological diagnosis of the entity remains challenging due to overlapping features with many other conditions including tuberculosis, Rosai-Dorfman disease, and even malignancy.[1,5]

Various risk factors were studied, but none were specifically related to granulomatous mastitis. Possible etiological factors include an inflammatory response to epithelial damage, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii infection, autoimmune disease, foreign body reaction, and a previous history of antipsychotic medications. In addition, the correlation between granulomatous mastitis and breastfeeding and childbirth was also studied.[3,4] The radiological features of the entity are non-specific.[6] The present case did not have a history of medications. She had a history of breastfeeding 8 years ago. Cytological diagnosis of granulomatous mastitis is challenging. Differential diagnoses include tuberculosis, fungal infections, sarcoidosis, and histiocytic disorders including Rosai-Dorfman disease. Cytological features of granulomatous mastitis include the presence of epithelioid cell granulomas, multinucleated giant cells, and numerous neutrophils. The presence or absence of necrosis is not very specific as few studies demonstrated necrosis in all the cases while few studies report necrosis in only a few cases.[2-5,7] Studies have shown that the presence of neutrophils is an important diagnostic clue in diagnosing granulomatous mastitis, as in the present case where histiocytes showing phagocytosed neutrophils along with the presence of numerous neutrophils in the background led to the diagnosis.[2,7,8] The prominence of emperipolesis is not a common feature. Apart from infectious causes, the major differential diagnosis considered was Rosai-Dorfman disease of the breast, which also shows an abundance of histiocytes showing emperipolesis. However, the literature search revealed that the type of cells ingested by histiocytes differs in both cases. In the case of Rosai-Dorfman disease, it is the lymphocytes that are being found in the cytoplasm of histiocytes in contrast to neutrophils which are found in granulomatous mastitis.[8] Other differential diagnoses include sarcoidosis, which shows naked granulomas in the absence of necrosis, which was not the case here. ZiehlNeelsen stain was performed to rule out tuberculosis, which did not reveal any acid-fast bacilli. Management of granulomatous mastitis includes antibiotics such as doxycycline, corticosteroids with or without surgery, or simple follow-up. Few refractory cases have shown improvement with methotrexate, although consensus on the optimal treatment method is lacking.[9]

SUMMARY

We discussed a case of granulomatous mastitis presenting in a middle-aged non-lactating woman with no previous history of psychiatric medications, contraceptive pills, or trauma who presented with a nodular lesion. The cytologic diagnosis is based on finding histiocytes with neutrophils, giant cells, and epithelioid cell granulomas with or without necrosis and excluding other common differential diagnoses such as tuberculosis and fungal infections. As far as IGM is concerned, there is no standard management approach. Therefore, treatment strategies should be tailored to the needs of each patient based on the culture report and response to initial medical management which avoids aggressive management.

COMPETING INTEREST STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

The authors declare that they do not have competing interest.

AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

Each author has participated sufficiently in the work and takes public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Each author acknowledges that this final version was read and approved.

ETHICS STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

As this is case without identifiers, our institution does not require approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB).

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (In alphabetic order)

IGM - Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis

MGG - May-Grunwald-Giemsa.

EDITORIAL/PEERREVIEW STATEMENT

To ensure the integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double-blind model (the authors are blinded for reviewers and vice versa) through automatic online system.

References

  1. , . Granulomatous mastitis: A lesion clinically simulating carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1972;58:642-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A 25-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:269-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis associated with Corynebacterium including Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii. Pathology. 2017;49:405-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Granulomatous mastitis: A therapeutic and diagnostic challenge. Breast Care (Basel). 2018;13:413-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Fine needle aspiration cytology of granulomatous mastitis. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:519-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A diagnostic dilemma for the breast radiologist. Insights Imaging. 2016;7:523-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: Cytologic and histologic study of 65 Egyptian patients. Acta Cytol. 2016;60:438-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Cytological diagnosis of RosaiDorfman disease: A study of twelve cases with emphasis on diagnostic challenges. J Cytol. 2020;37:46-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A systematic review of 3060 patients. Breast J. 2019;25:1245-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections