Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:1 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:3 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:4 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas -Sampling Techniques for Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:2 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas- EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:5 of 5
Commentary
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series (CMAS), Editorial
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series: Editorial
Cytojournal Quiz Case
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Methodology
Methodology Article
Methodology Articles
Original Article
Pap Smear Collection and Preparation: Key Points
Quiz Case
Research
Research Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
View Point
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
2005
:2;
18
doi:
10.1186/1742-6413-2-18

Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder with coexisting high-grade urothelial carcinoma: a case report and a review of the literature

Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, Division of Anatomical Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
Department of Pathology, University of Florida Health Science Center (UFHSC), Jacksonville, Florida, USA

* Corresponding author

Licence
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary bladder are rare. Here, we report a case of an 82-year-old man who presented with hematuria and was found to have an ulcerated lesion in the bladder. A diagnosis of small neuroendocrine cell carcinoma with coexisting minor high-grade urothelial components was rendered. In this report, the clinical, cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical features of this case are described, and a review of the literature about this neoplasm is presented. The differential diagnoses of small cell tumor in urinary bladder washing specimens are discussed.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma comprises carcinoid tumors, large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and small cell carcinomas. Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uri-nary bladder are rare. They usually involve male patients and coexist with urothelial carcinoma [1]. Among neuroendocrine tumors of the urinary bladder, small cell carcinomas are most common with more than 100 cases having been described [2-4]; carcinoid tumors are much less common; and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are very rare with only 3 cases reported [5]. The rare nature of a primary neuroendocrine carcinoma, especially in a cytology specimen, should be included in consideration as part of the differential diagnosis of the far more common urothelial carcinoma.

Case Reports

The patient was an 82-year-old male who presented with hematuria for 3 months. Cystoscopy revealed an ulcerated lesion in the bladder trigone. A bladder washing and a bladder biopsy were performed. The patient underwent bladder tumor resection and subsequent cystoprostatectomy. The patient's recovery was complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding, and he eventually expired within 3 months of his initial diagnosis. Autopsy concluded that the patient died from extensive upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to small bowel involvement with metastatic small cell carcinoma superimposed by DIC.

The cytological features of cytospin smears and cellblock of the bladder washing are presented in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, &6. The specimen was hypercellular and consisted of highly atypical cells with two distinct populations: small cells and large cells.

Bladder washing, cytospin preparation, Papanicolaou stain, ×400. Mixed small undifferentiated carcinoma and large urothelial carcinoma cells. The small cells are seen singly and in clusters with scanty cytoplasm, moderate cellular pleo-morphism, nuclear molding, dark chromatin, irregular nuclear contour, and background of blood and necrosis consistent with a small cell carcinoma. In addition, there are a few atypical cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm, small nucleoli, and irregular nuclear contours consistent with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Figure 2 inset: comparison of two small cell carcinoma cells and one large urothelial carcinoma cell.
Figure 1
Bladder washing, cytospin preparation, Papanicolaou stain, ×400. Mixed small undifferentiated carcinoma and large urothelial carcinoma cells. The small cells are seen singly and in clusters with scanty cytoplasm, moderate cellular pleo-morphism, nuclear molding, dark chromatin, irregular nuclear contour, and background of blood and necrosis consistent with a small cell carcinoma. In addition, there are a few atypical cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm, small nucleoli, and irregular nuclear contours consistent with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Figure 2 inset: comparison of two small cell carcinoma cells and one large urothelial carcinoma cell.
Bladder washing, cytospin preparation, Papanicolaou stain, ×400. Mixed small undifferentiated carcinoma and large urothelial carcinoma cells. The small cells are seen singly and in clusters with scanty cytoplasm, moderate cellular pleo-morphism, nuclear molding, dark chromatin, irregular nuclear contour, and background of blood and necrosis consistent with a small cell carcinoma. In addition, there are a few atypical cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm, small nucleoli, and irregular nuclear contours consistent with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Figure 2 inset: comparison of two small cell carcinoma cells and one large urothelial carcinoma cell.
Figure 2
Bladder washing, cytospin preparation, Papanicolaou stain, ×400. Mixed small undifferentiated carcinoma and large urothelial carcinoma cells. The small cells are seen singly and in clusters with scanty cytoplasm, moderate cellular pleo-morphism, nuclear molding, dark chromatin, irregular nuclear contour, and background of blood and necrosis consistent with a small cell carcinoma. In addition, there are a few atypical cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm, small nucleoli, and irregular nuclear contours consistent with high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Figure 2 inset: comparison of two small cell carcinoma cells and one large urothelial carcinoma cell.
Bladder washing, cell block, H&E, ×400: clusters of pure, small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the bladder. The small cell carcinoma cells are approximately twice the size of the RBCs with finely granular chromatin and nuclear molding.
Figure 3
Bladder washing, cell block, H&E, ×400: clusters of pure, small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the bladder. The small cell carcinoma cells are approximately twice the size of the RBCs with finely granular chromatin and nuclear molding.
Bladder washing, cell block, H&E, ×400: clusters of pure, small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the bladder. The small cell carcinoma cells are approximately twice the size of the RBCs with finely granular chromatin and nuclear molding.
Figure 4
Bladder washing, cell block, H&E, ×400: clusters of pure, small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the bladder. The small cell carcinoma cells are approximately twice the size of the RBCs with finely granular chromatin and nuclear molding.
Bladder washing, cell block, synaptophysin immunostain of small cell carcinoma, ×400. The tumor cells demonstrated cytoplasmic positivity.
Figure 5
Bladder washing, cell block, synaptophysin immunostain of small cell carcinoma, ×400. The tumor cells demonstrated cytoplasmic positivity.
Cell block, H&E, ×400: Urothelial carcinoma cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm and small nucleoli.
Figure 6
Cell block, H&E, ×400: Urothelial carcinoma cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm and small nucleoli.

The small cell population was the predominant one. It showed undifferentiated malignant small cells ranging in size and shape from lymphocyte-like to intermediate type (see Figure 4 for comparison with RBC size). The cells demonstrated a moderate degree of cellular pleomorphism, nuclear molding, finely granular chromatin, hyperchromatic nuclei, and inconspicuous nucleoli in a bloody and necrotic background (Figures 1, 2, 3). Occasional elongated cells and occasional rosette formation were also noted. These cytomorphologic features were indicative of small undifferentiated cell carcinoma. The cellblock (Figure 4) findings recapitulated the findings in the smears and were useful in subsequent immunohisto-chemical evaluations.

The large cell population was a minor component and showed highly atypical cells with central nuclei, small nucleoli, irregular nuclear contour, and dense cytoplasm in a bloody and necrotic background (Figures 1 &2). These cytomorphologic features were indicative of a high-grade urothelial carcinoma component. The cell block (Figure 6) findings recapitulated the findings in the smears and were useful in subsequent immunohisto-chemical evaluations.

Immunohistochemical stains were performed on cell blocks and showed positive staining of the small cell carcinoma component only for synaptophysin (Figure 5). The diagnosis was rendered as small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a high-grade urothelial carcinoma component.

Subsequently, the patient underwent bladder tumor resection and a 4 cm tumor was resected. The histology sections (Figures 7 and 8) demonstrated a small cell carcinoma in about 80% of the tumor (Figure 7) and a high-grade urothelial carcinoma in about 20% of the tumor (Figure 8). Immunohistochemical stains were performed and the tumor cells of the small cell carcinoma component were positive selectively for synaptophysin (Figure 9) and chromogranin, whereas, the high-grade urothelial carcinoma stained selectively for CK7, and CK20.

Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, H&E, ×200. Figure 7; Small cell carcinoma. Figure 8; Urothelial carcinoma with active mitosis evident.
Figure 7
Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, H&E, ×200. Figure 7; Small cell carcinoma. Figure 8; Urothelial carcinoma with active mitosis evident.
Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, H&E, ×200. Figure 7; Small cell carcinoma. Figure 8; Urothelial carcinoma with active mitosis evident.
Figure 8
Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, H&E, ×200. Figure 7; Small cell carcinoma. Figure 8; Urothelial carcinoma with active mitosis evident.
Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, synaptophysin immunostain. The bottom half of the section is the small cell carcinoma component of the bladder tumor which demonstrated synaptophysin positivity. The top half of the section is urothelial carcinoma that is negative for synaptophysin.
Figure 9
Tissue biopsy of the bladder tumor, synaptophysin immunostain. The bottom half of the section is the small cell carcinoma component of the bladder tumor which demonstrated synaptophysin positivity. The top half of the section is urothelial carcinoma that is negative for synaptophysin.

A subsequent radical cystectomy revealed a residual tumor of 4 cm in the greatest dimension. The tumor also appeared to have invaded through the muscularis propria into the adjacent fat. There were fifteen out of twenty-one bilateral lymph nodes involved by the small cell undifferentiated carcinoma. The tumor stage was yT3N2 Mx.

The autopsy revealed an intra-abdominal mass showing extensive metastatic small cell carcinoma (18 cm) with involvement of the duodenum (the entire duodenal wall including the mucosa) with extensive adhesions to the retroperitoneum, descending aorta, periaortic lymph nodes, and mesenteric fat. Tumor also involved peripancreatic and peri adrenal adipose tissue. Autopsy concluded that the patient died from extensive upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to small bowel involvement with metastatic small cell carcinoma superimposed by DIC.

Discussion

Here, we present a case of primary small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder coexisting with a high-grade urothelial carcinoma component. The cytomorphological pattern of the bladder washing was that of a small, blue cell neoplasm. The differential diagnoses included a high-grade urothelial carcinoma, a small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, and a lymphoma, as well as metastatic lesions, especially from the lung. Lymphomas of the bladder are rare, and have a good prognosis with a good response to chemotherapy [6]. The cytomorphological features of bladder lymphoma include single pleomorphic cells with round to oval nuclei, increased nuclear/ cytoplasmic ratio, and centrally located nuclei often with prominent nucleoli [7]. The cytomorphological features of metastatic small cell carcinoma of lung origin are indistinguishable from primary small cell carcinoma of the bladder. However, the presence of a high-grade urothelial carcinoma component in our case was suggestive evidence of a primary bladder lesion. In conjunction with the patient's clinical presentation and clinical work-up, the cytomorphology and immunocytochemical features supported the diagnosis of a primary small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Subsequent surgical excision revealed a high-grade urothelial carcinoma and small cell carcinoma.

Making the diagnosis of a small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder on a cytology specimen is important. Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the bladder usually are at an advanced stage at presentation. As in this case, the patient already had local invasion and lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis. Although bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma is an aggressive tumor, the prognosis is better than those patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of other sites [8].

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Steve Goodison for his critiques of this case report.

Declaration of competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. , , . Adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation of the urinaryl bladder. Arch Pathol Lab Me. 1986;110:1062-1066.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , et al. Small cell undifferentialted carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a light-microscopic, immuno-chemical, and ultrastructureal study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;11:606-617.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , et al. Small cell carcinoma of the uri-nary bladder: a clinicopathologic analysis of 22 cases. Cancer. 1992;69:527-536.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study with emphasis on cytologic features. Cancer. 1997;79:356-361.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Primary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Arch J Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(10):1229-1232.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Primary lymphoma of the bladder. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30(1):37-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Cytologic features of recurrent lymphoma involving the urinary bladder. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;31(3):185-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Primary small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a report of 25 cases. J Urol. 1995;153:1820-1822.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
1,324

PDF downloads
818
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections