Urine cytology: Pitfall due to a “remnant” lesion

Michael Chaump; Tamar Giorgadze; Andrew M. Schreiner

doi:10.4103/1742-6413.161604

View/Download PDF

Buy Reprints

PDF

Translate this page into:

CytoJournal Quiz Case

2015

:12;

16

doi:

10.4103/1742-6413.161604

Urine cytology: Pitfall due to a “remnant” lesion

Michael Chaump_MD, Tamar Giorgadze_{MD, PhD}, Andrew M. Schreiner¹_MD

^th

1Department of Pathology, New York Hospital Queens, Flushing, NY 11355, USA

*Corresponding author

Received: 2015-06-05, Accepted: 2015-06-07, Published: 2015-07

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

A 36-year-old G0 P0 woman presented with complaints of increased urinary frequency and nocturia. She did not report incontinence, dysuria, gross hematuria, or other medical history. Radiologic evaluation showed 2.6 cm irregular, solid and cystic lesion in the superior wall of the bladder, located immediately right of the midline. Cytopathologic findings in voided urine were as shown in Figure 1.

WHAT IS YOUR INTERPRETATION?

Cystitis cystica et glandularis
Endometriosis involving the bladder
Urachal remnant
Adenocarcinoma.

ANSWER

The correct cytopathologic interpretation is:

C. Urachal remnant

The urachus is a remnant of the allantois, a connection between the fetal bladder and the umbilical cord. There are different types of urachal remnants, which can be classified pathologically and radiologically as a communicating sinus between bladder and umbilicus, bladder dome diverticulum, or urachal cyst.[1 2] In this case transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed features shown in Figure 2.

The persistence of the urachus may be an underreported entity and overall, urachal remnants are not a common finding.[2] In infants, a concerning clinical symptom is the presence of umbilical discharge in remnants that communicate to the umbilicus.[3] Because the abdominal ultrasound is often used as a screening test, many urachal remnants are detected early in life in the pediatric population.[4] In one study by Ozbek et al., 99% of children referred for abdominal ultrasound for any abdominal symptoms (other than those of a patent urachal remnant) showed incidental ultrasonic evidence of a urachal remnant.[5] These may also persist asymptomatically into adult years. In a study performed in autopsies of patients >38 years, the persistence of a urachal remnant was present in 32% of bladders.[6] In adult patients, lower abdominal pain or a palpable mass may be present. Furthermore, lower urinary tract symptoms may be seen as a result of infection. As a more extreme complication of this entity, cases of pelvic Actinomyces spp. has been reported subsequent to infected urachal remnant.[7]

Surgical intervention is recommended when a persistent urachus is identified. Through surgical intervention, symptomatic recurrence and complications can be prevented. Traditionally, an open procedure approached through a lower midline laparotomy or semicircular infraumbilical incision was employed. However, laparoscopic approaches to resection offers lower morbidity and mortality, in addition to improved cosmetic benefits.[8 9 10 11]

Radiologically, if a urachal remnant has an area of calcification, urinary calculus or urothelial carcinoma should be considered in the list of differential diagnoses.[12] Histologically, the urachal remnants are composed of three layers: The innermost epithelial layer that can be urothelial or columnar, middle layer of fibroconnective tissue and the outermost smooth muscle layer that is in continuity with the surrounding detrusor muscle.

To the best of our knowledge, cytological features of the urachal remnants presented in the urine specimen have not been reported in English literature. In our case, the voided urine was moderately cellular with the absence of blood and inflammation in the background. Sheets of cells were present that were comprised of varying numbers of bland appearing glandular cells with scant to moderate amount of cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei. The nuclei had smooth contours with slightly stippled fine chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli. Neither mitotic figures nor apoptotic bodies were identified. Also present were small strips and clusters of similar appearing glandular cells exhibiting eccentric nuclei with nuclear polarity. Groups of cells with granular cytoplasm were also seen [Figure 1]. The final cytopathologic interpretation was: “Abundant sheets and clusters of bland glandular epithelium”.

ADDITIONAL QUIZ QUESTIONS

In the fetus, the urachus is a remnant of the connection between the:
1. Median umbilical ligament and allantois
2. Allantois and yolk sac
3. Fetal bladder and the umbilical cord
4. Umbilical cord and yolk sac
5. None of the above.
The epithelium of the inner urachal layer is:
1. Urothelial
2. Columnar
3. Squamous
4. A and B
5. B and C.
Cytological features of urachal remnants in urine cytology include:
1. Sheets of cells comprised of bland glandular cells
2. Strips and clusters of bland glandular cells with polarized, eccentric nuclei
3. Smooth nuclear contours with stippled chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli
4. Glandular cells with granular cytoplasm
5. All of the above.

Answers to additional quiz questions

1. C; 2. D; 3. E

During fetal development, the fetal bladder and the umbilical cord is connected by the allantois. During development, the bladder descends and the urachal lumen constricts to form the median umbilical ligament. The urachus may persist as a remnant if this process is incomplete
Pathological examination is necessary for a diagnosis of the urachal remnant. As described histologically, the urachal remnant has an inner epithelial layer, middle fibroconnective tissue layer, and the outer smooth muscle layer. The lining can be urothelial or columnar epithelium
Cytological features of urachal remnants include sheets, strips, and clusters of bland appearing glandular cells. These cells have scant to moderate amount of cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei. The nuclear features are also benign appearing with smooth contours, slightly stippled fine chromatin, and inconspicuous nucleoli. Because this is a benign entity, mitotic figures, and apoptotic bodies should not be present.

BRIEF REVIEW OF THE TOPIC

The patient underwent a transurethral resection of the posterior superior bladder wall lesion. The histological examination showed a cystic lesion that involved the bladder lamina propria and muscularis propria. The cyst was lined by stratified cuboidal epithelium without significant cytological atypia or mitoses. The underlying stroma was congested. Also seen were ductal structures lined by cuboidal epithelium sorrounded by muscular walls that were in continuity with the detrusor muscle, consistent with a urachal remnant [Figure 3].

Urachal remnants overall are not a common fining in urine cytology. Whereas the radiological and pathological differential diagnosis is broad attention to cytological details can provide a definitive diagnosis.

Cytomorphological features of urachal remnants that can be seen in liquid-based preparation of urine specimens include the following:

Sheets or clusters comprised of varying numbers of bland appearing cells with scant to moderate amounts of cytoplasm
Strips of columnar cells with eccentric, polarized nuclei
Benign appearing nuclei with smooth nuclear contours, finely stippled chromatin, and inconspicuous nucleoli.

Overall, cytological features of urachal remnants in urine cytology may mimic many benign and malignant conditions involving the bladder. High index of suspicion, bland cytology of the glandular epithelial fragments, and clinical-radiological correlation will be helpful in distinguishing this entity from malignant processes and arriving at the correct diagnosis.

Surgical intervention is recommended when a persistent urachus is identified to avoid symptomatic recurrence and complications. Whereas an open procedure has been classically described, laparoscopic approaches to resection offers lower morbidity and mortality.

Focused differential diagnosis of urachal remnants

Cystitis cystica/glandularis

Can mimic a mucinous cystic tumor or bladder tumor radiologically[13]
Cytomorphological identification relies on the presence of cuboidal or columnar mucin-secreting cells which can also be of intestinal-type[14]
Significant atypia and mitoses are only rarely found which also differentiates them from adenocarcinoma[15]
Epithelium identified is usually distinguishable from the transitional epithelium seen with urachal remnants. However, both entities may cytologically appear similar if the urachal remnant is lined by columnar epithelium.

Endometriosis involving the urinary tract

Not a common entity, occurring in approximately 1% of all patients with endometriosis
Most frequent site of occurrence in the dome of the bladder[16]
Cytomorphological analysis of urine will often show hemosiderin laden macrophages or the presence of endometrial cells
Endometrial cells are identified as honeycombing sheets or as spherules with clusters of stromal cells surrounded by epithelial cells[17]
Usually, no nuclear atypia is observed and nucleoli are inconspicuous.

Müllerianosis of the urinary bladder

Rare lesion that has not been frequently reported in the literature
Grossly it appears as a polypoid or cystic mass with dark blue or black cysts on cystoscopy
Cytomorphological features resemble endosalpingiosis, endometriosis or endocervicosis.[18 19]

Nephrogenic metaplasia/adenoma

Often the diagnosis is preceded by a history of instrumentation or chronic inflammatory insult[20]
In liquid-based preparations of urine specimens, variably sized cell clusters and papillary structures are evident
Cytomorphological analysis shows atypical cuboidal cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm. The nuclei may be round to slightly irregular with granular chromatin and small nucleoli
Cytoplasmic vacuoles can be present which may give the cells a signet-ring appearance.[21 22]

Adenocarcinoma of the bladder (including primary bladder adenocarcinoma, urachal adenocarcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma)

Adenocarcinoma of the bladder

Adenocarcinomas of the bladder or urothelial carcinomas with glandular differentiation are rare in young patients, as are metastatic adenocarcinomas. Histologically, the majority of bladder adenocarcinoma is comprised of glandular structures showing features of colonic adenocarcinoma (enteric type), intracellular mucin (signet cell type), or extracellular mucin (mucinous type)
Cytomorphological analysis of urine cytology will show glandular cells with cytological atypia and frequent mitoses
In half of the cases of urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, a second population of malignant cells with morphology consistent with high-grade urothelial carcinoma will be present
Adenocarcinomas (as well as rarer types of carcinomas) have been described as arising in urachal remnants.[23] In these cases, cytological features of adenocarcinomas arising in urachal remnants are similar to the other primary and secondary adenocarcinomas that can be encountered in the bladder.[24]

COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

All authors of this article declare that we qualify for authorship as defined by ICMJE http://www.icmje.org/#author.

Each author has participated sufficiently in the work and takes public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of this article.

ETHICS STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS

As this is a quiz case without identifiers, our institution does not require approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB) (or its equivalent).

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

IRB - Institutional Review Board.

REFERENCES

Copp HL, Wong IY, Krishnan C, Malhotra S, Kennedy WA, . Clinical presentation and urachal remnant pathology: Implications for treatment. J Urol. 2009;182(4 Suppl):1921-4.
[Google Scholar]
Ueno T, Hashimoto H, Yokoyama H, Ito M, Kouda K, Kanamaru H, . Urachal anomalies: Ultrasonography and management. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:1203-7.
[Google Scholar]
Li Destri G, Schillaci D, Latino R, Castaing M, Scilletta B, Cataldo AD, . The urachal pathology with umbilical manifestation: Overview of laparoscopic technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21:809-14.
[Google Scholar]
Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC, . Current diagnosis and management of urachal remnants. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:2148-52.
[Google Scholar]
Ozbek SS, Pourbagher MA, Pourbagher A, . Urachal remnants in asymptomatic children: Gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29:218-22.
[Google Scholar]
Schubert GE, Pavkovic MB, Bethke-Bedürftig BA, . Tubular urachal remnants in adult bladders. J Urol. 1982;127:40-2.
[Google Scholar]
Marella VK, Hakimian O, Wise GJ, Silver DA, . Pelvic actinomycosis. Urologic perspective. Int Braz J Urol. 2004;30:367-76.
[Google Scholar]
Siow SL, Mahendran HA, Hardin M, . Laparoscopic management of symptomatic urachal remnants in adulthood. Asian J Surg. 2015;38:85-90.
[Google Scholar]
Pust A, Ovenbeck R, Erbersdobler A, Dieckmann KP, . Laparoscopic management of patent urachus in an adult man. Urol Int. 2007;79:184-6.
[Google Scholar]
Cutting CW, Hindley RG, Poulsen J, . Laparoscopic management of complicated urachal remnants. BJU Int. 2005;96:1417-21.
[Google Scholar]
Cadeddu JA, Boyle KE, Fabrizio MD, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR, . Laparoscopic management of urachal cysts in adulthood. J Urol. 2000;164:1526-8.
[Google Scholar]
Rodrigues JC, Gandhi S, . Don’t get caught out! A rare case of a calcified urachal remnant mimicking a bladder calculus. J Radiol Case Rep. 2013;7:34-8.
[Google Scholar]
Dohan A, Ferlicot S, Bessède T, Soyer P, Rocher L, . Low-grade mucinous cystic tumor mimicking urinary bladder tumor: Imaging-pathologic correlation. Urology. 2013;81:e33-4.
[Google Scholar]
Rau AR, Kini H, Pai RR, . Morphological evaluation of cystitis glandularis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009;52:203-5.
[Google Scholar]
Pantanowitz L, Otis CN, . Cystitis glandularis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:181-2.
[Google Scholar]
Schneider A, Touloupidis S, Papatsoris AG, Triantafyllidis A, Kollias A, Schweppe KW, . Endometriosis of the urinary tract in women of reproductive age. Int J Urol. 2006;13:902-4.
[Google Scholar]
Arava S, Iyer VK, Mathur SR, . Cytological diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis. J Cytol. 2010;27:77-8.
[Google Scholar]
Guan H, Rosenthal DL, Erozan YS, . Mullerianosis of the urinary bladder: Report of a case with diagnosis suggested in urine cytology and review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40:997-1001.
[Google Scholar]
Branca G, Barresi V, . Müllerianosis of the urinary bladder: A rare tumorlike lesion. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:432-6.
[Google Scholar]
Harik LR, O’Toole KM, . Nonneoplastic lesions of the prostate and bladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012;136:721-34.
[Google Scholar]
Amin W, Parwani AV, . Nephrogenic adenoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:659-62.
[Google Scholar]
Lee A, Baloch Z, . Cytology of nephrogenic adenoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20:321-2.
[Google Scholar]
Paner GP, Barkan GA, Mehta V, Sirintrapun SJ, Tsuzuki T, Sebo TJ, . Urachal carcinomas of the nonglandular type: Salient features and considerations in pathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:432-42.
[Google Scholar]
Okumura S, Nishimura T, Hasegawa J, Kanamori S, Abe H, Akimoto M, . Carcinoma of urachus: Report of 3 cases and review of literature. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1984;30:1255-61.
[Google Scholar]