Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:1 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:3 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas - EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:4 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas -Sampling Techniques for Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:2 of 5
CMAS‡ - Pancreas- EUS-FNA Cytopathology (PSC guidelines) S1:5 of 5
Commentary
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series (CMAS), Editorial
CytoJournal Monograph Related Review Series: Editorial
Cytojournal Quiz Case
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Methodology
Methodology Article
Methodology Articles
Original Article
Pap Smear Collection and Preparation: Key Points
Quiz Case
Research
Research Article
Review
Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
View Point
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Book Review
2025
:22;
35
doi:
10.25259/Cytojournal_14_2025

Cytopathology of urine (and the Paris system): CMAS #4. Editor: Shikha Bose; Series Editor: Vinod Shidham

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Eva M. Wojcik, MD Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States. ewojcik@lumc.edu

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Wojcik EM. Cytopathology of urine (and the paris system): CMAS #4. Editor: Shikha Bose; Series Editor: Vinod Shidham. CytoJournal. 2025;22:35. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_14_2025

The accurate evaluation of urinary cytology has been a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of urothelial carcinoma for decades. However, the field has long struggled with subjectivity, inconsistency, and diagnostic challenges. In response to these issues, The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology was introduced in 2016[1] to bring structure, clarity, and evidence-based standards to the interpretation of urine cytology. This book serves as a guide to understanding and applying the Paris System, making it a valuable resource for both novice and experienced cytopathologists.

Since its inception, TPS has become a global standard, offering a reliable framework for interpreting cytological findings in relation to clinical outcomes. Its structured approach helps bridge the gap between pathologists and clinicians, fostering clearer communication and ultimately improving patient care. In short, TPS has revolutionized the field by providing standardized diagnostic criteria that promote greater consistency and accuracy in urinary cytology.

The Cytopathology of Urine (and The Paris System) book[2] is divided into nine well-referenced and richly illustrated chapters, each meticulously designed to enhance the reader’s understanding of the TPS system and its practical application in daily practice. From novice learners to seasoned professionals, this book provides insights that are both accessible and comprehensive.

A dedicated chapter on specimen sampling and preparation underscores the foundational importance of ensuring specimen adequacy.[3] The authors discuss criteria for adequacy and, crucially, the reasons why specimens may be deemed inadequate. This chapter also offers extensive, well-illustrated descriptions of normal cellular components in urine specimens, emphasizing that familiarity with the “normal” is essential to recognize abnormalities.

Not everything that deviates from normal is malignant. The chapter on benign and nonneoplastic lesions presents excellent examples of non-malignant entities encountered in urine cytology. These serve as crucial diagnostic reference points.[4]

The chapter on low-grade urothelial neoplasia provides an in-depth discussion of the morphologic characteristics of these tumors.[5] It also offers a comprehensive overview of their imaging, cystoscopic findings, and treatment modalities. Of particular note, the chapter presents the histologic appearances and classification basis of these neoplasms, along with an eloquent discussion of their molecular background. The inclusion of these neoplasms in the “negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC)” category within TPS is thoroughly explained, helping the reader understand the limitations of cytology in this context.

The chapter on HGUC is richly illustrated and features well-organized tables and algorithms that enhance the book’s visual appeal.[6] This chapter includes numerous examples of less common HGUC subtypes, making it an invaluable guide for practicing pathologists who need to differentiate these rare cases.

Recognizing that not all malignant bladder neoplasms are urothelial carcinomas, the book includes a comprehensive chapter on non-urothelial malignancies.[7] Like the other chapters, it is well-illustrated and thoroughly referenced, offering pathologists a complete resource on bladder cancer pathology.

A chapter on the history of urine cytology and the evolution of the Paris System provides a succinct yet informative overview.[8] More importantly, it acknowledges that TPS is a work in progress, with future advancements in digital pathology likely to shape its evolution toward an automated, standardized reporting system.

One of the most distinctive features of this book is its chapter on diagnostic pitfalls.[9] Through a series of comprehensive, well-illustrated steps, the authors guide readers in avoiding common mistakes and arriving at the correct diagnosis. For cytologists who appreciate the beauty of cytomorphology, this chapter is a visual and intellectual treat.

The book also includes a thorough discussion of the role of biomarkers in urine cytology.[10] This chapter is well-referenced, covering practically all biomarkers introduced to date and summarizing their sensitivity and specificity in comparison to urine cytology.

Finally, an entire chapter is devoted to digital pathology and artificial intelligence, preparing readers for the future of the field.[11] This chapter offers an excellent discussion of the current status of digital pathology technologies, along with a detailed guide to available products, specific terminology, and current guidelines. These are presented in table format, making the chapter an invaluable tool for laboratories looking to start or expand their digitized pathology services.

In conclusion, this book is both a tribute to the advancements in urinary cytology and a comprehensive roadmap for its future. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology has already significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and communication in the field, and this text serves as a key resource for pathologists looking to refine their skills and stay abreast of future developments. Whether you are a seasoned professional or a newcomer to the field, this book provides a thorough, visually appealing, and informative guide to mastering the Paris System and enhancing patient outcomes through precise and reliable diagnostic practices.

With its careful attention to detail, extensive illustrations, and a forward-thinking approach to emerging technologies, this book stands as an essential resource for those committed to advancing the practice of urinary cytology.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This book is part of the CMAS (CytoJournal Monograph/Atlas Series) project.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Not applicable.

ABBREVIATIONS

Not applicable.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

EW: Compiled and reviewed the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

EDITORIAL/PEER REVIEW

To ensure the integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double-blind model (authors are blinded for reviewers and vice versa) through an automatic online system.

FUNDING: Not applicable.

References

  1. , , . The Paris system for reporting urinary cytology Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Fourth cytopathology monograph and atlas series book titled “cytopathology of urine (& the Paris system)” as extension of open access charter of cytopathology foundation Inc. CytoJournal. 2025;22:4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Cytology of the urinary tract: Specimen sampling, preparation, adequacy, and normal cellular components. CMAS J. 2024;1:2.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Benign and non-neoplastic urinary tract lesions. CMAS J. 2024;1:3.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Low-grade urothelial neoplasia. CMAS J. 2024;1:6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. . High-grade urothelial carcinoma. CMAS J. 2024;1:7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Non-urothelial malignancy in urine cytology. CMAS J. 2024;1:5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Reporting systems for urinary cytology: Past, present, and future. CMAS J. 2024;1:4.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Pitfalls in urinary tract cytology: Algorithmic approach and the Paris system. CMAS J. 2024;1:9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Review of biomarkers for urine cytology. CMAS J. 2024;1:1.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. . A review of digital pathology and AI applications for urine cytology. CMAS J. 2024;1:8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
102

PDF downloads
0
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections