Myoepithelioma of soft tissue and diagnostic pitfall in cytology
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.
The report on “Myoepithelioma of soft tissue and diagnostic pitfall in cytology” is very interesting. Bhanvadia et al. concluded that “a cytopathologist should be aware of bland nature of round, epithelioid and plasmacytoid cells in myxoid and fibrillary background to hit the correct diagnosis.” In fact, the misinterpretation problem as discussed in the present report is a common problem in diagnostic cytology and it is considered as a postanalytical error. Nevertheless, in laboratory medicine, there are also possible errors in other phases of laboratory testing. Bhanvadia et al. might not recognize the importance of quality control and possible error, which might occur in nay phase of the test ranging from preanalytical thorough analytical until postanalytical phase. In laboratory medicine, the most common problem error does not occur in postanalytical phase but preanalytical phase. The problem usually occurs due to patient preparation and specimen correction. This kind of problem can be seen worldwide regardless the quality certification of the medical laboratory or not.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS
The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest.
AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS
Joob 50 %, Wiwanitkit 50 %.
ETHICS STATEMENT BY ALL AUTHORS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (In alphabetic Order)
- Cytojournal. 2017;14:14Myoepithelioma of soft tissue in the gluteal region: Diagnostic pitfall in cytology.
- [Google Scholar]
- BMC Clin Pathol. 2001;1:5Types and frequency of preanalytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory, a 6 – month monitoring.
- [Google Scholar]