View/Download PDF
Editorial
2011
:8;
23
doi:
10.4103/1742-6413.91243
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Thank you reviewers – CytoJournal 2011

Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center, and Detroit Medical Center, Old Hutzel Hospital (Department of Cytology-Ground Floor), 4707 St. Antoine Blvd, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Corresponding author
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.
Available FREE in open access from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2011/8/1/23/91243.

Abstract

CytoJournal, with its continued contribution of scientific cytopathology literature to the public domain under open access (OA) charter, thanks its dedicated peer reviewers for devoting significant efforts, time, and resources during 2011. The abstracts of poster-platform submissions to the 59th Annual Scientific Meeting (November 2011) of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) in Baltimore, MD, USA, were peer reviewed by the ASC Scientific Program Committee.

Keywords

Reviewers
peer-review
academic editor
cytopathology
cytojournal
Open Access
cytopathology foundation

Based on the “close peer review” policy of CytoJournal, all reviewers are anonymous.[1] This formal annual public acknowledgment is an important thank you note from the entire CytoJournal team to all peer reviewers and academic editors assigned to both accepted and rejected manuscripts [Table 1].[24] We thank all CytoJournal reviewers for participating in the peer review of manuscripts during 2011,[524] with an overall acceptance rate of 33%. We also thank the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) for publishing the issue consisting of the abstracts for poster-platform submissions to the 59th ASC (November 2011) Annual Scientific Meeting. These submissions were peer reviewed by the ASC Scientific Program Committee.[25] This issue is available FREE on the web in computer searchable HTML format and in book-like reading flash format as eBook on the web.[2627] In addition, a printable and searchable PDF version is also available to all Cytopathology Foundation (CF) members[28] and individual members of CytoJournal (CytoJ) OA Stewards-Plus organizations.[29]

Table 1: 2011 CytoJournal peer reviewers and academic editors

If a potential of conflict of interest is perceived, CytoJournal manuscripts are assigned to “academic editors.”[1424] The academic editors execute the process independently from the initial step of appointing the peer reviewers to the final conclusion of accepting or rejecting a particular manuscript.

We also thank readers and academicians to increasingly join as CF members[28] and support the OA charter of CF and CytoJournal. Exemplary initiative of various organizations, societies, and departments-institutions by joining as CytoJ OA Stewards-Plus organizations to allow their constituent members to benefit from the OA charter in cytopathology is highly appreciated.[29] These benefits include total waiver of Article Publication Charge (APC) of $1500 for authors and FREE download of all CytoJournal articles by readers.[28]

CytoJournal has provided a robust OA platform to all authors for publishing their high-value cytopathology and related scientific literature as a freely available resource all over the world without losing their hard-earned copyright. Under OA charter, the authors agree to share the copyright in the public domain.[30] Additional benefits include demonstrated higher access to OA articles, leading to enhanced visibility and increased downloads with bolder impact.[3133] The chances of citation and perpetual referencing in the web matrix, although dependent on the actual quality and stature of the individual study article, are at least similar to conventional old model commercial journals. However, Moore's law for the internet suggests a higher potential with a huge long-term impact.[3435]

The manuscripts are assigned through an online process by the CytoJournal editorial team to the reviewers selected from the core reviewer panel.[36] CytoJournal invites cytopathology experts around the globe via “Reviewer Corner” on CytoJournal home page (www.CytoJournal.com) to join this expanding group through “Join as CytoJournal Reviewer” link.[37]

Our gratitude to all authors, readers, and supporting personnel in making CytoJournal one of the premier sources of cytopathology articles in open access for the public and academia around the globe. We wish all CytoJournal editorial board members, reviewers, authors, and readers a very prosperous academic year.

REFERENCES

  1. CytoJournal Peer review policies. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/prp.asp
  2. , , . EDITORIAL: Thank you reviewers- CytoJournal 2006. Cytojournal. 2006;3:1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . EDITORIAL: Thank you reviewers- CytoJournal 2007. Cytojournal. 2007;4:1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . EDITORIAL: Thank you CytoJournal reviewers and authors - 2008 through 2010. Cytojournal. 2010;7:1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Salivary duct carcinoma with striking neutrophil-tumor cell cannibalism. Cytojournal. 2011;8:15
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Cytological analysis of small branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms provides a more accurate risk assessment of malignancy than symptoms. Cytojournal. 2011;8:21
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Utility of on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens. Cytojournal. 2011;8:20
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Malignancy rate in nondominant nodules in patients with multinodular goiter: Experience with 1,606 cases evaluated by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytojournal. 2011;8:19
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . The cytomorphologic spectrum of small-cell carcinoma and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in body cavity effusions: A study of 68 cases. Cytojournal. 2011;8:18
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Cyto-morphological features of extramedullary acute megakaryoblastic leukemia on fine needle aspiration and cerebrospinal fluid cytology: A case report. Cytojournal. 2011;8:17
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Utility of a limited panel of calretinin and Ber-EP4 immunocytochemistry on cytospin preparation of serous effusions: A cost-effective measure in resource-limited settings. Cytojournal. 2011;8:14
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . A review of uncommon cytopathologic diagnoses of pleural effusions from a chest diseases center in Turkey. Cytojournal. 2011;8:13
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . A review of the utilization of fine needle aspiration in clinical practice and research in Nigeria. Cytojournal. 2011;8:12
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Detection of amyloid in abdominal fat pad aspirates in early amyloidosis: Role of electron microscopy and Congo red stained cell block sections. Cytojournal. 2011;8:11
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of metastases to the pancreas: A study of 25 cases. Cytojournal. 2011;8:7
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Pattern of epithelial cell abnormality in Pap smear: A clinicopathological and demographic correlation. Cytojournal. 2011;8:8
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , . Teenage cervical screening in a high risk American population. Cytojournal. 2011;8:9
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy is useful evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy in a cancer center. Cytojournal. 2011;8:10
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Cytologic features of microcystic adnexal carcinoma. Cytojournal. 2011;8:5
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Solitary Tracheobronchial Papilloma: Cytomorphology and ancillary studies with histologic correlation. Cytojournal. 2011;8:6
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Microfilariae coexisting with a follicular lesion in thyroid aspirate smears in an uncommon case of a retrosternal thyroid mass, clinically presenting as malignancy. Cytojournal. 2011;8:4
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman Disease): A case report and review of 49 cases with fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytojournal. 2011;8:3
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Diagnosis of metastatic fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Cytojournal. 2011;8:2
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . p16 immunocytochemistry on cell blocks as an adjunct to cervical cytology: Potential reflex testing on specially prepared cell blocks from residual liquid-based cytology specimens. Cytojournal. 2011;8:1
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Abstracts for the 59th Annual Scientific Meeting (November 2011) by American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) at Baltimore, MD, USA. . CytoJournal. 8:16
    [Google Scholar]
    Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2011/8/1/16/84993
  26. eBook Formats in The Market. Available from: http://www.pttmedia.com/ebooks/ebook_en_pro2.htm
  27. CytoJournal archived articles. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/browse.asp?sabs=n
  28. Cytopathology Foundation (CF) membership. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/CFMember.asp
  29. CytoJournal OA Steward's corner. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/OASteward.asp
  30. CytoJournal open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Creative commons- Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0). Available from: http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
  31. , , , . First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 - open access, peer-review, and impact factor. CytoJournal. 2006;3:5
    [Google Scholar]
  32. The Open Citation Project- Papers and presentations. Reference Linking and Citation Analysis for Open Archives. Available from: http://opcit.eprints.org/opcitpapers.shtml
  33. The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. Available from: http://www.opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
  34. , , . Internet growth: Is there a “Moore's Law” for data traffic? ATandT Labs - Research. Available from: http://www.alturl.com/j8svg
  35. Moore's law. Available from: http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law
  36. CytoJournal core reviewer panel. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/reviewers.asp
  37. Join as CytoJournal Reviewer. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/joinus.asp

    Fulltext Views
    3812

    PDF downloads
    10
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections

    © Copyright 2020 – CytoJournal – All rights reserved.
    Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Cytopathology Foundation.

    ISSN (Print): 0974-5963
    ISSN (Online): 1742-6413